My Take On Thrive The Movie

A local here in town arranged for this documentary to be shown at the community center on 11-11 and enough people showed up that he arranged to show it again at the local theater.  It was a free showing for the people that came and it was a fairly big group for our little tiny town.

 

I left the movie with mixed feelings, on the one hand it did a fabulous job of moving from one complex set of problems to another touching on most of the basics that those of us who have been watching The Powers That Be for years are all well aware of.  I thought this is a really great overview of the issues and power structure that is working diligently to rob plunder and rape all of humanity.  On the other hand it started with alien disclosure and a lot of assumptions about the ET activity with no reference to any possibility that some of these technologies are our own black ops type groups from around the world.  We know that the disclosure project and Steven Greer are part of the false ET threat kind of agenda, and that all tied into free energy technology.  I have always thought if they were to try and pull off a false ET thing they would need to have these new found ET friends give us something to “help” our planet in order to pull that off.   But I allowed myself to flow past that and just watch.

Then we entered the phase of information about the problems which was the part that was well put together.  It is when we came to the supposed solutions part that my heart sank and I knew that this production was not all that it seemed.  In fact it even included David Icke talking about the Problem – Reaction  – Solution scenario  when in fact this movie is itself showing us the problem(s) to get our reaction then offering solutions that are not solutions at all.

I wanted to believe that Foster Gamble an heir to the Proctor and Gamble fortune was truly the idealist he portrayed himself, because both he and his wife gave Oscar worthy performances, and maybe they believe some of their own shit who knows.  Here is the thing, the solution was some kind of utopian society created by getting rid of the federal reserve, cutting the pentagon budget in half, and making smaller government.  Nothing about reining in the corporations he had just demonized.  I have to ask who in the congress would cut the military budget in half?  They are bought and paid for by the corporations who profit off the military industrial complex.  So that cannot happen within the current system.  The changes the system would need to be even semi functional would have to be made by the people who are put into office by the dysfunctional system.  They will never do it, because the system’s money put them there, so making those changes would require ,as they like to refer to it in the mainstream media, regime change and an a updated constitution.

In his utopia we would all have more money, and comfort, more time off to enjoy it, and yet we would still be a capitalist society with banks, money and a stock market and we would have used all the money saved from the pentagon to clean up the planet so the air and water would be pure.  Hmmm, this is after he went to great lengths earlier to explain to us how money is fake, in fact he once again allowed David Icke to explain it.  So he wants to keep the pretend money on computers and pretend investments and the economic slavery to big corporate masters, just a friendlier cleaner version.

He claims a big awakening and yet anyone looking around can see that even this supposedly big awakening will be lucky to be 5%  to 10% of the world population and the rest will continue to work their personal agendas.  I really long for the days when the idealist in me could have been ignorant enough to believe any of this solution he offered up, but alas what I usually refer to as my cynicism (but I should call realism) knows that even if we could reverse those numbers and 90-95% woke up a bunch of people attempting to rebuild will in their imperfection recreate so many of the same systems that create the issues.  Weirdly I am still an idealist but my idealism is not born in any energy that thinks this world society can be saved.  In fact my idealism goes beyond a world in need of any form of money.

Speaking of money, Mr. Gamble has released his utopian Problem – Solution – Reaction as a for profit venture.  If he were the idealist he claims to be this information would be far too important not to get out there for free.  He though, has “investors” who are all unnamed so we know not who bought him and his movie.  He also asks for donations as well and claims they will go to help provide his solutions.  He gives us the tried and true new age “exchange of energies” argument in relation to all those who work on the movie, that they deserve to be compensated for their work.  Well Mr. Gamble you grew up and have always lived in privilege, no doubt you could afford to pay them for their work with no great hardship if this is really your passion and life’s journey as you claim.  Interestingly aside from admitting at the beginning that he is an heir to the Proctor and Gamble fortune he did not mention his family’s company, and all the destructive things they have done to earth, or offer a single solution that his own family would offer up for this utopia.

He did though offer up solutions for us little people, we could give to the organizations that his website recommends, hmm big surprise, solution A. is always turn over our money!  He suggested we could vote with our wallet by buying organic and non GMO and so forth.  Great idea Foster,  if you would like to pony up the cash for those less fortunate to shop the high priced more earth friendly things I would jump right on board,  Unfortunately most of us have not lived in privilege and don’t have that option.  That also assumes that anyone could get congress to pass legislation to label GMO products so anyone knew what they were buying.  These are the kind of solutions that are always offered up by people who have never had to live without millions of dollars.  He explained how we would in his utopia magically have more disposable income to pay off our houses and cars.  Well Mr. Gamble, plenty of people don’t have a house or a car at all, let alone one they own in tandem with a bank in need of being paid off, and I am not talking about those in third world counties I am talking about right here in the good ‘ol USA.

The base assumption of all solutions was that all people are good and will act with integrity, honesty and ethics.  God my heart would love to believe that, but my version is this; All people above a certain spiritual vibration will act in that way.  Those below that vibration may or may not depending on what they want, power, money, whatever.  It is not as if The Powers That Be are forcing people to murder, rape and do other heinous things to one another.  Those are issues of personal ethics and morality, when it comes down to it, they do not come from governments, churches or any other organization.  Personal ethical moral behavior comes from a choice you make from your own center.  All we need to do is look around to see the obvious reality that too few people are at that center, making those kinds of ethical choices.

The best part of the whole documentary for me was really showing how the torus energies and geometries move within all the structures of the universe.  This really is a great 3d depiction of what I have always called the universal life force.  It is at the essential aspect of the fully open and cycling kundalini that is the first awaking of the sphere (containing the human version of the 64 Tetrahedron) which eventually brings humans to an ascended state.  It must first find its balance, and with the human that means soul purification.  There is no definite time for that to happen it is unique to each person.   They must first get their kundalini open and fully awake, and then they must take the steps to form the sphere and get all those energies working as they were intended before the purification (balancing) can begin.  There is a moment in the movie where they show a balancing energy in process that included the 4 direction around the sphere, where the elemental chakras reside.

Overall I think that anyone who needs a good overview of a lot of the issues on earth right now and who is behind them, presented in a concise easy to follow manor may want to see this movie.  Just go into it knowing up front that there is an obvious agenda.

The torus; The underlying structure of the torus is the Vector Equilibrium, or “VE.” It is the blueprint by which nature forms energy into matter.  In order for the pattern to show up at every scale, there must be a way for organisms to grow while maintaining proportion among their parts. There is one spiral vortex in nature that accomplishes this. It’s called the phi spiral and can be seen as everything comes into form, from tiny ferns to giant galaxies.  The phi spiral in one direction will often be seen counterbalanced with another one in the opposite direction – called the Phi Double Spiral.

When you put all three aspects of the pattern together – the torus, the VE, and Phi spirals – you end up with one whole pattern that looks like sorta like this pic I found on the internet which has elements I was trying to draw with no talent for drawing in these diagrams from the site dealing with the sacred sphere, the elemental chakras and kundalini.  With the eternal circle diagram being the horizontal disc at the center

 

torus

 

eternal circle inside sphere elementals

Advertisements

Fiction Exposes the Sorry State of America

Sometimes Boston Legal really makes their point well and in the season ender when Allan is told he is representing traitors he responds that the country was started by traitors!  I Love it!

Denny’s defense of America was just as telling as Allen’s arguments about how far from the ideals of the Declaration of Independence this country has traveled.  He freely admits to all the horrendous things America is doing and defends them by giving examples of how we have ALWAYS done these things.

In reality we started screwing up immediately after the Declaration when we approved a constitution that allowed slavery, didn’t acknowledge women, and used phases like “all men are created equal” knowing full well that it was not referring to black, red or yellow men and did not include women at all.  They had no idea that in the future, generations of Americans would be born that actually believed that referred them, them even if they were not white men!  After all that power belonged solely to white men was a given at their time!  These generation for the most part have no idea our great country was not only started by traitors to the British Crown but on lands acquired through Genocide of the 500 Nations already here.  History gets presented in a favorable way for those who even learn any history at all.

Allan made great closing arguments with only one mistake, calling us a democracy, with all the historical references in the show the writers should have known not to use that term since we were never a democracy, by its original definition, but a Representative Republic.  Now the definitions have all conveniently been changed to make a democracy and Representative Republic and a few other forms of government “democracies”  So that we can spread democracy around the world by force if necessary!

Here are some old definitions from 1928

These succinct definitions of what is Democracy and what is a Republic was produced by the US Army in 1928,  These definitions have been quietly withdrawn since, soon after.

Democracy:

 

A government of the masses.

Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of “direct” expression.

Results in mobocracy. 

Attitude toward property is comunistic-negating property rights.

Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate. whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences.

Results in demagogism license, agitation, discontent, anarchy. 

Democracy is the “direct” rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success.

A certain Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, nearly two centuries ago, had this to say about Democracy: ” A Democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of Government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of public treasury.  From that moment on the  majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, always to be followed by a Dictatorship.”

A democracy is majority rule and is destructive of liberty because there is no law to prevent the majority from trampling on individual rights. Whatever the majority says goes! A lynch mob is an example of pure democracy in action. There is only one dissenting vote, and that is cast by the person at the end of the rope.

Republic:

Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them.

Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure.

Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences.

A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass.

Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress.

Is the “standard form” of government throughout the world.

A republic is a form of government under a constitution which provides for the election of:

  1. an executive and
  2. a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create
  3. a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize
  4. certain inherent individual rights.

Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy.

Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They “made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic.”

A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution holds the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual. Under this system of government a lynch mob is illegal. The suspected criminal cannot be denied his right to a fair trial even if a majority of the citizenry demands otherwise.

_____________________________________________

Difference between Democracy and Republic, in brief:

Democracy:
a:
government by the people; especially : rule of the majority.

b: a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.

Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences

Republic
a: a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president  : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government.

b: a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.

______________________________________________

Democracy and Republic are often taken as one of the same thing, but there is a fundamental difference.  Whilst in both cases the government is elected by the people, in Democracy the majority rules according to their whims, whilst in the Republic the Government rule according to law.  This law is framed in the Constitution to limit the power of Government and ensuring some rights and protection to Minorities and individuals.

The difference between Republic and Righteous Republic is that in the Republic the Government rules according to the law set up by men, in the Righteous Republic the law is the Law of God.  Only in the Righteous Republic it can truly be said “One nation under God” for it is governed under commandments of the only One True God and there is no pluralism of religions.


Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered.

Truth be know we are no longer a Democracy or a Representative Republic but in fact a Fas
cist State! 

In “Fascism Anyone?” Laurence Britt, identifies 14 characteristics
common in fascist regimes. His comparisons of Hitler, Mussolini,
Suharto, Pinochet, and Franco yielded these 14 common traits.

They are listed below

1) Powerful and continuing nationalism
Fascist regimes tend to make use of patriotic
mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other
paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere as
are patriotic symbols on clothing, public displays,
and cars.

2) Disdain for the recognition of human
rights
Because of the fear of enemies and the need
for security, the people in fascist regimes are
persuaded that human rights and civil liberties
can be ignored in certain cases because of
“need”. The people tend to look the other
way or even approve of torture, summary
executions, long incarcerations of prisoners
without trial, etc.

3) Identification of enemies/scapegoats
as a unifying cause
The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic
frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived
a common threat or foe: ethnic or religious
minorities, liberals, communists, terrorists,
etc.

4) Supremacy of the military
Even when there are widespread domestic problems,
the military is given a disproportionate
amount of government funding, and the domestic
agenda is neglected.

5) Rampant sexism
The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost
exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist
regimes, traditional gender roles are made more
rigid. Opposition to abortion is high as is homophobia,
and anti-gay legislation as national policy.

6) Controlled mass media
Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the
government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly
controlled by government regulation, or
sympathetic media spokespeople and executives.
Censorship, especially in war time, is common.

7) Obsession with national security
Fear is used as a motivational tool over the
masses.

8) Religion and government are intertwined
Governments in fascist regimes tend to use the
most common religion in the nation as a tool to
manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and
terminology is common from government leaders,
even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically
opposed to the government’s policies
and actions.

9) Corporate power is protected
The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist
nation often are the ones who put the government
leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial
business/government relationship for the power
elite.

10) Labor power is suppressed
Because the organizing power of labor is the
only real threat to a fascist government. Labor
unions are either eliminated entirely or
are severely suppressed

11) Disdain for intellectuals and the arts
Fascist regimes tend to promote and tolerate
hostility to higher education and academia. It
is not uncommon for professors and other
academics to be censored or even arrested.
Free expression in the arts is openly attacked,
and governments often refuse to fund the
arts.

12) Obsession with crime and punishment
Under fascist regimes, the police are given
almost limitless power to enforce laws. The
people are often willing to overlook police
abuses and even forego civil liberties in the
name of patriotism. There is often a national
police force with virtually unlimited power in
fascist nations.

13) Rampant cronyism and corruption
Fascist regimes almost always are governed
by groups of friends and associates who appoint
each other to government positions
and use governmental power and authority to
protect their friends from accountability. It is
not uncommon in fascist regimes for national
resources and even treasures, to be appropriated
or even outright stolen by government
leaders.

14) Fraudulent elections
Sometimes elections in fascist regimes are a
complete sham. Other times elections are
manipulated by smear campaigns or even assassination
of opposition candidates, use of
legislation to control voting numbers or political
district boundaries, and the manipulation
of the media. Fascist nations also tend to
use their judiciaries to manipulate or control
elections.

I Was Wrong about David Cook

Wrong by a long shot, wow

David Archuletta 44% David Cook 56% of 97 million votes holy crap that is a lot of votes I wonder how many people are out there like me that love to watch Idol but don’t even vote?

That’s a shock I thought Archuletta had it, but ultimately with 97 million votes that means he got over 42 million votes so that is more than enough to start a healthy career in music!  I always new David Cook would have a healthy career if he won or not.  Pretty clear they both will do well and numerous other members of the top 10.

Wow the song the two Davids sang together at the beginning was better than either of them separate last night.  Then OMG Mike Myers, Guru Pitka LOL

Not more Sanjaya barbs leave the kid alone!  At least Kimmel didn’t say he couldn’t sing.  While he is no David, and he was really bad at song choice, the kid has a voice and luckily a great sense of humor smile_teeth

I love Jordin but who chose that dress???? it was dreadful!  I was kind of surprised to see her singing since she has been on vocal rest,  You could hear her voice was still somewhat strained.  Well now that I think about it she was on with Chris Brown a few weeks ago and she sounded good then.

Oh I forgot about Michael Johns in my post on David Cook I hope he makes a album! And Amanda the gravely rocker oh crap pretty much all of the top 10-12 could make a record this year.

Any Chance for David Cook?

NOPE  I just don’t see it!  He’ll still make a good record and we’ll buy it, but last night little Archuletta was on point.  For a few weeks there I was wondering where he went, he wasn’t quite the kid I fell in love with listening to.  I suppose the pressure and nerves in the situation are just overwhelming at any age.  Last night though he was back and wow when he is on, he really touches your heart.

So we love you David Cook but I do believe you will be coming in second tonight, second though is pretty damn good!  This has really been a good season I think we can look forward to several good albums coming out. Jason, Brooke, hopefully, Carly, Syesha, and of course the two Davids, that’s a lot of music out of one season.  I suppose we are likely to get a country album too from the little blond but I’m just not into country or her singing so I could care less.